Property Outline: Present Estates, Future Interests, & Rule Against
Perpetuities
Estates
History
1) Land became
1. Inheritable & alienable in 1290
2. Devisable & divisible in 1540
2) Seisen/poss'n
1. Only freehold can transfer land
2. Transfer by feoffment w/livery of seisen /
3. Fee w/delivery of possn
4. Ceremony symbollic of transfer
Present Estates (P/E)
1) Categories
1. Fee simple absolute (FSA)
2. Fee simple determinable (FSD)
3. Fee simple subj. 2 a cond. subseq. (FSSTCS)
4. Fee simple subj. 2 an executory lim. (FSSTEL)
5. Fee tail
6. Life Estate (L/E)
2) Transfer by feoffment livery of seisen of freehold estates
FSA
1) Charact.'s
1. Lang. --2 A & his heirs
2. Duration --¥(infinite)& unlimited
3. Transferrability of P/E --deed, will,
intestate succession
4. No associated future int.
5. Words of purchase --2 A
6. Words of limitation --& his heirs
2) Escape general inheritability b/c can mov from person
2 person
3) Living person has no heirs
Defeasible P/Es
1) Fee simple that R capable of being undone
FSD
1) Charact.'s
1. Lang. --2 A & his heirs (Ahh) + words of duration
2. Words of duration --so long as, while, until,
during the X that
3. Duration --potentially ¥ so long as event
doesn't occur
4. Transferrability --deed, will, intestate
5. Future Estate (F/E) --Possibility of reverter
(POR), Executory int. (E.I.)
2) If the cond. is dropped, then still fee simple
determinable & imply POR
2 fill the ¥ line
3) If acquire both FSD & POR then U own FSA b/c merged
P/E & F/E
4) Duration words R signals
5) Terminates automatically when stop using as condition
lays out
FSSTCS
1) Characts
1. Lang. --Ahh + provided that, but
2. Duration --Potentially ¥ until cond. broken &
Rt. of entry
(ROE) is exercised
3. Transferrability --deed, will, intestacy
4. F/E --ROE, Pwr. of Term. (POT), Rt. of Reentry (ROR)
2) O must act if the condition is broken b/c term. is not automatic
3) If drop condition beginning w/ provided that or but,
then there's no ROE so becomes FSA
4) U do not imply ROE
Jxnal Issues w/FSD & FSSTCS
1) Adv. Poss'n
1. Would want FSD b/c ends automatically; \ can
start building
the title when not use by the condition
2. Under FSSTCS, can stay w/o undermining Os rts.
(orig. owner w/ROE) before O exercises ROE
2) Statute of Lim.
1. Many jxn's have stat. of lim. over both POR / ROE
2. Hostility toward both b/c clogs on land titles
& uncertainty arises
FSSTEL
1) Charact's
1. Lang. --2 Ahh, but if B marries C 2 Bhh
2. Duration --Potentially ¥ until the cond. is broken
3. Transferrability --deed, will, intestacy
4. Future Interest (F/I) --E.I.
2) E.I. similar 2 automatic ROE in a stranger in a 3rd party
3) It's all in formula so intent is irrelev.
Fee Tail
1) Charact.'s
1. Lang. --2A & the heirs of his body / 2A & the
heirs of her body
2. Duration --Potentially ¥ so long as there R
descendents of 1st taker
3. Transferrability --deed but only estate 4 life
of another & not
devisable; Descendent 2 heirs of body
4. F/I --Reversion (RVN), Remainder (REM)
2) O may have implied RVN's
L/E
1) Charact's
1. Lang. --A4 life
2. Duration --life of designated person
3. Transferrability --deed if during meas. life;
by will/intestacy if est. pur autre vie
4. F/I --REM, RVN, POR, ROE, E.I.
2) L/E is piece of X line meased by human line 4 present,
poss'ry / freehold estate
Defeasible L/E
1) Like Defeasible Fee Simple
1. Determinable L/E
2. L/E subj. 2 cond. subseq.
3. L/E subj. 2 executory lim.
Typical leasehold int's
1) Determinable term 4 yrs. subj. 2 cond. subseq.
2) Determinable term 4 yrs. subj. 2 exec. lim.
Future Interests
All Present Estates
1) All have F/I except 4 FSA
Definition
1) Pieces of X line that do not give a present rt. of possn
2) Carry a future int. label & estate label
F/Is left in the grantor; Retained by the Transferor
1) Catalogues
1. RVN
2. POR
3. ROE
2) RVN
1. RVN in O after O has conveyed
2. Found in Term 4 Yrs. (TFY), L/E, / Fee tail
3. Transferrability
(1) Alienable by deed
(2) Descendable by intestacy
(3) Devisable by will
3) POR
1. Found in FSD / L/E
2. Transferrability
(1) Devisable by will
(2) Descendable by intestate succession
(3) Alienable by deed in many places
4) ROE
1. Found in FSSTCS / L/E
2. Transferrability
(1) Devisable
(2) Descendable
(3) Alienable in some jxn; in other jxns
it's alienable only
w/in the RVN / by release 2 the holder of
the preceding estate
F/I created in 3rd persons; Created in Transferees
1) Catalogues
1. REM
2. E.I.
2) REM
(1) Seisen passed
(2) No pretermination of F/I
(3) Vested
1. Ascertained person
2. No cond. precedent 2 taking of seisen
(4) Indefeasibly Vested REM. (IVR)
1. Poss'ry certain @ future
2. Not cut off in size
(5) Vested Rem. subj. 2 open (VRSTO) / partial
defeasance, partial divestment (VRSPD)
1. May cut down in size
2. A gift 2 a class capable of increase
w/@ least 1 class member qualified
3. Some VRSTO also subj. 2 compl. defeasance
(6) Vested REM. subj. 2 compl. defeasance/compl.
divestment (VRSTCD)
1. Rem. beneficiary is existence & ascertained
2. Not subj. 2 cond. precedent
3. Subj. 2 cond. subseq. + E.I. / ROE
(gen'ly speaking)
4. Subj. 2 cut off
5. Cond. subseq. --comes after grant;
lang. of the cond.
subseq. in the sentence 2 the lang.
creating 1st future
int.; F/I 1st vests in owner & if its 2 B
lost then there's
a later divestment, subseq. divestment;
takes effect after vesting
6. Wording --"grant, but if/equivalent
cond.'al lang. & ROE/EI"
(7) Contingent Rem. (CR)
1. REM in ascertained person which is
subj. 2 a cond. precedent OR
2. It's a rem. in an unborn/unascertained person
3. Cond. precedent--cond. precedes the
grant / part of the description of the taker; must B
satisfied before vesting/poss'n is possible
4. O has RVN in all conveyances
3) Paired F.I. in Transferees
1. Two alt. CRs or
2. VRSTCD + E.I. (almost always)
Tech. RVN always follow 2 alt. CRs
4) Before 1536
(1) Destructibility of CRs
1. CR's destroyed unless vest on/before
the term. of the preceding estate
2. Natural term. of preceding estate
causing the destruction of the CRs
3. If VRSTCD, REM not terminated & can
divest later; dif.
btwn cond. precedent & cond. subseq.
(2) No springing int's
(3) Not shifting int's
1. Can't shift off of another person
2. Created Use & FSA in T's legal title &
A's FSSEL + X's E.I.(springing) in equitable title
(O-->Thh, 2 the use
of Ahh, but if she doesn't go 2 college 2
the use of Xhh)
(4) Doc. of Mergers
1. If CR's gets in btwn mergers, then destroyed
2. CR's that R'nt ready gets destroyed in mergers
5) After 1536 (passed statute of uses)
1. Springing E.I.
2. Shifting E.I.
3. Still Destructibility of CR
4. Indestructibility of E.I.
5. Terms 4 yrs. R not freehold int. so cant
transfer seisen
6. (Look @ probs; Lec. 23)
6) Shellys Case
1. The rule is that whenever it says REM. 2 heirs
of really have REM 2 Ahh
2. A 4 life, REM. 2 heirs of A will read as A 4
life, REM 2 Ahh, so that they merge & A has FSA
7) Doctrine of Worthier Title
1. Where it applies, REM 2 heirs of grantor is
nullity; doesn't exist
Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP)
Social Goal
1) Can tie up land / other form of prom. 4 a rsbl X but
if exceeds, then efforts 2 tie up is void (RAP)
2) Only 3 F/Is R offensive in RAP
1. VRSTO
2. CR
3. EI
Steps in Analysis
1) Classify w/o thinking about perpetuities
2) Only test 3 offensive F/Is
3) Must Vest / fail 2 vest w/in rsbl X
4) Test the int. @ the X of creation & must B good @ the
X of creation
5) Rsbl per. of X is per. of lives & beings + 21 yrs.
remembering that lives
in the womb R lives in being
6) RAP destroys the bad int's that won't vest/fail 2 vest
w/in rsbl per.
Subrules
1) Live 2 any age
2) Die @ any age
3) Marry @ any age
4) Give birth @ any age
5) A child conceived is a life in being
6) Events that usually take a short X can take forever
(except pregnancies)
7) Int's must B good @ the X of creation
X of Creation of Ints
1) Will--X when testator died
2) Deed (intervivos)--X created when transferred (irrevocable)
Measuring Life
1) Person claiming int. is good can offer any life that
it's good
2) Opponent can kill the life
1. If killing A causes the int. 2 vest / fail 2
vest w/in the per. of rule
2. To save the int., the death of A causes the
int. 2 vest
3) Look @ probs in Lec. 25
RAP is Remoteness against Vesting
1) If CR destructible & destruction takes place w/in per.
of rule, then it's good
2) Destructibility not the key but the X
3) U can B U'r own meas'ing lives
4) Ways 2 approach
1. Look @ it
2. Look 4 a life that will save the int.
3. Sit. where vesting might occur outside the
per. of rule, then no good
5) Open group cannot B measing lives 2 save ints